Get Adobe Flash player

Thoro

Maryland Alimony Divorce Trial Vinculo Matrimonii Mensa Et Thoro Lawyers Attorneys

Although Maryland allows a decree for alimony to be passed without the granting of a divorce, a trial court erred in awarding alimony to a wife in a divorce action under Md. Code Ann., Fam. Law § 11-101(a)(1) because she failed to establish entitlement to either a divorce a vinculo matrimonii or a mensa et thoro

Going through a divorce is one of the most stressful experiences you will go through in your entire life.

The last thing you want to think about after you have been married for a period of time is how you are going to deal with a divorce and all the issues that arise in a divorce.

If you are in the unfortunate position of having to file for a divorce in Maryland or you have been served with a divorce complaint in Maryland, you need the help of an experienced divorce lawyer in Maryland.

The SRIS Law Group Maryland divorce lawyers have a thorough understanding of the divorce laws in Maryland and how the Maryland divorce laws may apply to your case.

Our Maryland divorce attorneys have helped many clients who are going through a divorce in Maryland.

If you need help with a Maryland divorce, contact us for help at 888-437-7747.

We have offices in Baltimore & Montgomery County

Post to Twitter

Maryland Divorce Lawyers

In Porter v. Porter, 177 A. 464 Md.,(1935) the court stated that single act of violence will ordinarily not authorize divorce a mensa et thoro unless act indicates intention of doing serious bodily harm, or causes reasonable apprehension of serious danger in future.

If you are contemplating filing for a divorce in Maryland or if you are defending a divorce in Maryland, then do not hesitate to contact a Maryland divorce lawyer from SRIS Law Group. A Maryland divorce lawyer from the SRIS Law Group will discuss with you the facts of your case and advise you as to your options as they relate to Maryland divorce laws.

 

Maryland Divorce Lawyers

Allegany County, Anne Arundel County, Baltimore County, Calvert County, Caroline County, Carroll County, Cecil County, Charles County, Dorchester County, Frederick County, Garrett County, Harford County, Howard County, Kent County, Montgomery County, Prince George’s County, Queen Anne’s County, Saint Mary’s County, Somerset County, Talbot County, Washington County, Wicomico County, Worcester County

Post to Twitter

Maryland Divorce Lawyers

In Stirn v. Stirn, 36 A.2d 695 Md.,(1944) the court stated that a single act of violence, if it discloses intention to do serious bodily harm or is of such character as to threaten serious danger in the future, may constitute such “cruelty” as to justify a divorce a mensa et thoro.

If you are contemplating filing for a divorce in Maryland or if you are defending a divorce in Maryland, then do not hesitate to contact a Maryland divorce lawyer from SRIS Law Group. A Maryland divorce lawyer from the SRIS Law Group will discuss with you the facts of your case and advise you as to your options as they relate to Maryland divorce laws.

Maryland Divorce Lawyer

Maryland Divorce Lawyers

Allegany County, Anne Arundel County, Baltimore County, Calvert County, Caroline County, Carroll County, Cecil County, Charles County, Dorchester County, Frederick County, Garrett County, Harford County, Howard County, Kent County, Montgomery County, Prince George’s County, Queen Anne’s County, Saint Mary’s County, Somerset County, Talbot County, Washington County, Wicomico County, Worcester County

Post to Twitter

Maryland Divorce Lawyers

In Benton v. Benton, 79 A.2d 146 Md.,(1951) the court stated that (1) As ground for divorce a mensa et thoro, abandonment and desertion contain two inherent elements, namely, cohabitation ended and intention to desert.(2) Cohabitation ended and intention to desert need not be identical as to the time of their commencement, in order to justify divorce a mensa et thoro on ground of abandonment.

If you are contemplating filing for a divorce in Maryland or if you are defending a divorce in Maryland, then do not hesitate to contact a Maryland divorce lawyer from SRIS Law Group. A Maryland divorce lawyer from the SRIS Law Group will discuss with you the facts of your case and advise you as to your options as they relate to Maryland divorce laws.

Maryland Divorce Lawyer

Maryland Divorce Lawyers

Allegany County, Anne Arundel County, Baltimore County, Calvert County, Caroline County, Carroll County, Cecil County, Charles County, Dorchester County, Frederick County, Garrett County, Harford County, Howard County, Kent County, Montgomery County, Prince George’s County, Queen Anne’s County, Saint Mary’s County, Somerset County, Talbot County, Washington County, Wicomico County, Worcester County

Post to Twitter

Maryland Divorce Lawyers

In Hoffman v. Hoffman, 215 A.2d 808 Md.,(1966) the court stated that termination of cohabitation and intention to desert need not necessarily be identical in their commencement to entitle offended spouse to divorce a mensa et thoro.

If you are contemplating filing for a divorce in Maryland or if you are defending a divorce in Maryland, then do not hesitate to contact a Maryland divorce lawyer from SRIS Law Group. A Maryland divorce lawyer from the SRIS Law Group will discuss with you the facts of your case and advise you as to your options as they relate to Maryland divorce laws.

Maryland Divorce Lawyer

Maryland Divorce Lawyers

Allegany County, Anne Arundel County, Baltimore County, Calvert County, Caroline County, Carroll County, Cecil County, Charles County, Dorchester County, Frederick County, Garrett County, Harford County, Howard County, Kent County, Montgomery County, Prince George’s County, Queen Anne’s County, Saint Mary’s County, Somerset County, Talbot County, Washington County, Wicomico County, Worcester County

Post to Twitter

Maryland Divorce Lawyers

In Simmont v. Simmont, 153 A. 665 Md.,(1931) the court stated that unjustified desertion, where erring spouse has not offered to resume cohabitation under circumstances warranting reasonable belief that cohabitation could be resumed without endangering health or reasonable comfort of innocent spouse, is sufficient ground for divorce a mensa et thoro.

If you are contemplating filing for a divorce in Maryland or if you are defending a divorce in Maryland, then do not hesitate to contact a Maryland divorce lawyer from SRIS Law Group. A Maryland divorce lawyer from the SRIS Law Group will discuss with you the facts of your case and advise you as to your options as they relate to Maryland divorce laws.

Maryland Divorce Lawyers

Allegany County, Anne Arundel County, Baltimore County, Calvert County, Caroline County, Carroll County, Cecil County, Charles County, Dorchester County, Frederick County, Garrett County, Harford County, Howard County, Kent County, Montgomery County, Prince George’s County, Queen Anne’s County, Saint Mary’s County, Somerset County, Talbot County, Washington County, Wicomico County, Worcester County

Post to Twitter

Maryland Divorce Lawyers

Evidence tending to show that husband left home in September, 1949, after having been on bad terms with his wife since 1943 when he had left the marital bedroom was sufficient to warrant a decree of divorce a mensa et thoro. Hull v. Hull 201 Md. 225, 93 A.2d 536 Md. (1953).

If you are contemplating filing for a divorce in Maryland or if you are defending a divorce in Maryland, then do not hesitate to contact a Maryland divorce lawyer from SRIS Law Group. A Maryland divorce lawyer from the SRIS Law Group will discuss with you the facts of your case and advise you as to your options as they relate to Maryland divorce laws.

Maryland Divorce Lawyer

Maryland Divorce Lawyers

Allegany County, Anne Arundel County, Baltimore County, Calvert County, Caroline County, Carroll County, Cecil County, Charles County, Dorchester County, Frederick County, Garrett County, Harford County, Howard County, Kent County, Montgomery County, Prince George’s County, Queen Anne’s County, Saint Mary’s County, Somerset County, Talbot County, Washington County, Wicomico County, Worcester County

Post to Twitter

Maryland Divorce Lawyers

Wife, separated from husband for less than three years after his rejection of request for reunion, held entitled to divorce a mensa et thoro. Downs v. Downs 154 Md. 430, 140 A. 831 Md. (1928).

If you are contemplating filing for a divorce in Maryland or if you are defending a divorce in Maryland, then do not hesitate to contact a Maryland divorce lawyer from SRIS Law Group. A Maryland divorce lawyer from the SRIS Law Group will discuss with you the facts of your case and advise you as to your options as they relate to Maryland divorce laws.

Maryland Divorce Lawyer

Maryland Divorce Lawyers

Allegany County, Anne Arundel County, Baltimore County, Calvert County, Caroline County, Carroll County, Cecil County, Charles County, Dorchester County, Frederick County, Garrett County, Harford County, Howard County, Kent County, Montgomery County, Prince George’s County, Queen Anne’s County, Saint Mary’s County, Somerset County, Talbot County, Washington County, Wicomico County, Worcester County

Post to Twitter

Maryland Divorce Lawyers

Abandonment and desertion, if proved and corroborated, would, prima facie, entitle wife to divorce a mensa et thoro. Binder v. Binder 16 Md.App. 404, 297 A.2d 293 Md.App. (1972).

If you are contemplating filing for a divorce in Maryland or if you are defending a divorce in Maryland, then do not hesitate to contact a Maryland divorce lawyer from SRIS Law Group. A Maryland divorce lawyer from the SRIS Law Group will discuss with you the facts of your case and advise you as to your options as they relate to Maryland divorce laws.

Maryland Divorce Lawyer

Maryland Divorce Lawyers

Allegany County, Anne Arundel County, Baltimore County, Calvert County, Caroline County, Carroll County, Cecil County, Charles County, Dorchester County, Frederick County, Garrett County, Harford County, Howard County, Kent County, Montgomery County, Prince George’s County, Queen Anne’s County, Saint Mary’s County, Somerset County, Talbot County, Washington County, Wicomico County, Worcester County

Post to Twitter

Maryland Divorce Lawyers

In Harding v. Harding, 22 Md. 337 Md.,(1864) the court stated that where a husband repeatedly tells his wife, after she has given birth to a child, that she must leave his home as soon as her confinement is over, and admits in his answer to her bill for divorce that he would have removed her if she had not gone, and she voluntarily leaves his house in consequence, and the husband afterwards declares that she shall not return, and that he will not support her and her child, a divorce a mensa et thoro and alimony may be granted the wife on the ground of desertion.

If you are contemplating filing for a divorce in Maryland or if you are defending a divorce in Maryland, then do not hesitate to contact a Maryland divorce lawyer from SRIS Law Group. A Maryland divorce lawyer from the SRIS Law Group will discuss with you the facts of your case and advise you as to your options as they relate to Maryland divorce laws.

Maryland Divorce Lawyer

Maryland Divorce Lawyers

Allegany County, Anne Arundel County, Baltimore County, Calvert County, Caroline County, Carroll County, Cecil County, Charles County, Dorchester County, Frederick County, Garrett County, Harford County, Howard County, Kent County, Montgomery County, Prince George’s County, Queen Anne’s County, Saint Mary’s County, Somerset County, Talbot County, Washington County, Wicomico County, Worcester County

Post to Twitter

CLIENT MEETING LOCATIONS

Maryland

Rockville 240-399-0304
Baltimore 240-399-0304

Contact Us

First Name:
Last Name:
Email @:
Phone #: --
Message: or call us 1.888.437.7747 Click To Chat


Maryland Lawyer

Atchuthan Sriskandarajah on Channel 7 News

         
 

CLIENT MEETING LOCATIONS

 
         
400 East Pratt Street, 8th Floor
Baltimore, Maryland 21202
Phone: 240-399-0304
Get Direction
  1 Research Court, Suite 450
Rockville, Maryland 20850
Phone: 240-399-0304
Get Direction