DUI Potomac Maryland Lawyer Driving Influence
DUI Potomac Maryland Lawyer Driving Influence
Card Mic v. State
Facts:
Defendant was charged with driving while intoxicated and driving under the influence of alcohol. Defendant waived his right to a jury trial, pleaded not guilty, and waived formal proof. Defendant was found guilty of driving under the influence and sentenced to 60 days. Defendant sought review of the sentence entered in the Circuit Court, Maryland on his conviction for driving under the influence of alcohol.
DUI Potomac Maryland Lawyer
Issue:
- Whether the trial court properly convicted the defendant for driving under the influence of alcohol?
Discussion:
The court vacated the enhanced sentence imposed by the circuit court. Md. R. Crim. Causes 4-245(b) provided that when the law permitted but did not mandate additional penalties because of a specified previous conviction, the court could not sentence defendant as a subsequent offender unless the state’s attorney served notice of the alleged prior conviction on defendant or counsel before the acceptance of a plea of guilty or nolo contendere or at least 15 days before trial in circuit court or 5 days before trial in district court, whichever was earlier. Defendant did not receive notice that he would be subject to enhanced punishment until after the district court trial took place. The court vacated the sentence of the circuit court entered on defendant’s conviction of driving under the influence of alcohol and remanded the case for resentencing
The SRIS Law Group Maryland lawyers will do their best to help you with your case. Contact a Maryland lawyer from our firm to discuss your case.
A Maryland lawyer from our firm will talk with you about your case in Maryland and advise you about your options. You can count on a lawyer from our firm to try their best to help you obtain the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
We have client meeting locations in Rockville (Montgomery County) & Baltimore.
Disclaimer:
These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group. They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.
DUI Potomac Maryland Lawyer Psychiatrist Test Stress Disorder
DUI Potomac Maryland Lawyer Psychiatrist Test Stress Disorder
John Austin v. State
Facts:
Defendant was charged with DUI and driving while intoxicated after a police officer saw her driving on a public road and noticed that her speech was slurred, her eyes were watery and bloodshot, and there was a strong odor of alcohol on her breath. The officer testified that he conducted three field sobriety tests, the nystagmus test, the walk and turn, and the one-leg stand, and that defendant failed all three tests. However, the officer did not take a sample of defendant’s breath or blood for analysis. He also testified that defendant was very loud and obnoxious while he was booking her at the police station and that she injured herself after she was placed in a cell. In her defense, defendant claimed that she suffered post-traumatic stress disorder and offered the testimony of a psychiatrist to explain her behavior. However, the trial court ruled that the psychiatrist’s testimony was not admissible. Defendant was convicted of driving under the influence (DUI) after a jury trial in the Circuit Court for Howard County (Maryland), and she appealed.
DUI Potomac Maryland Lawyer
Issue:
- Whether the psychiatrist’s testimony was admissible in DUI proceedings?
Discussion:
The appellate court held that the trial court abused its discretion by allowing the State to offer evidence detailing defendant’s post-arrest behavior to raise an inference that she was intoxicated and then excluding expert testimony defendant offered to explain that behavior. The appellate court vacated the trial court’s judgment and remanded the case for a new trial
The SRIS Law Group Maryland lawyers will do their best to help you with your case. Contact a Maryland lawyer from our firm to discuss your case.
A Maryland lawyer from our firm will talk with you about your case in Maryland and advise you about your options. You can count on a lawyer from our firm to try their best to help you obtain the best result possible based on the facts of your case.
We have client meeting locations in Rockville (Montgomery County) & Baltimore.
Disclaimer:
These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group. They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.
Maryland Charged DUI Driving Under Influence Intoxicated Guilty Lawyers Attorneys
Defendant was charged with driving while intoxicated and driving under the influence of alcohol. Defendant waived his right to a jury trial, pleaded not guilty, and waived formal proof. Defendant was found guilty of driving under the influence and sentenced to 60 days.
A DUI offense is a very serious crime.
The SRIS Law Group Maryland DUI attorneys can defend you against any type of DUI charge.
Our Maryland DUI lawyers have the experience to defend you against any type of DUI charge.
Contact a SRIS Law Group Maryland DUI lawyer in Maryland.
Maryland Jury Trial Imprisonment Appeal De Novo DUI Lawyers Attorneys
Defendant was entitled to a jury trial on his de novo appeal because he was subject to a penalty of two months imprisonment for the charge of driving while under the influence of alcohol, and defendant had not waived that right.
A DUI offense is a very serious crime.
The SRIS Law Group Maryland DUI attorneys can defend you against any type of DUI charge.
Our Maryland DUI lawyers have the experience to defend you against any type of DUI charge.
Contact a SRIS Law Group Maryland DUI lawyer in Maryland.
Maryland Lawyer
